Generated by Codex with GPT 5.6 Sol High
Will I be in trouble for using AI too much? (Blind)
- h1b&h4.ead (Cyberhaven): Token maxing was 2025
- UaxP22 (Canva): Do you actually read any of the design docs your agents produce and rank? How do you know if the ranking actually reflects quality?
- yacdiz (Microsoft): Pip is coming
Where do all the 40+ yo in big tech go? (Blind)
- unempGimp (ex-Amazon): We get taken out to the back of the office and are shot. Then they tell the young ones that we made so much money that we went to live in a farm upstate, and the new generation continues to grind. It’s the circle jerk of life.
- 2h5bfs4qh (Salesforce): They start families and rotate to retirement castle companies like IBM, Intel, Dell, Oracle, Microsoft, Salesforce. Places with good income but better options for work-life balance. Their families become priorities, so they seek an environment that allows that.
- portyug (eBay): Age descriminatiion is rampant in big tech. They want someone who is willing to spend all hours at work. Hard to do that if you have family you love.
Opus 5.5 is fking dumb and it can’t even write a flowchart properly! (Blind)
- downquark (Meta): You are in the control group being routed to Gemini 4.
- ThePMDude (GoFundMe): Yeah not buying that opus and sol 6.1 are as good as the frontier models. Seems like bs.
- GrabThem (Microsoft): Opus is over energetic code monkey
Gpt is slow staff engineer stuck in analysis paralysis.
You should use them in pair - gpt to analyze, design, review and opus to code, test
In my limited experience with Gemini models, they behave more like GPT models.
Why does having ADHD help in this new AI world ? (Blind)
- ectM68 (Bloomberg): Because AI doesn’t tire of the endless questions and rabbit hole pursuit ADHD individuals engage in, and it offloads much of the cognitive weaknesses of that profile (execution lagging behind the brain’s other abilities).
Furthermore, if autism is in the mix too, which it often is, you have to understand that autistic folks spend an enormous amount of cognitive energy in social interactions because they are computing rather intuiting. And in the end what they’re interested in is the information exchange, not so much the oxytocin sync regular individuals want, which they’re mostly incapable of anyway. So they’d much rather interact with an impersonal AI that has all the upside of information exchange and none of the anxious computational overhead. - jzkanaksq (Google): ADHD people need physical activity. Sitting at a computer will make ADHD even worse.
- Connect2M3 (Google): i am an adhd person. 10+ yoe and the last year I’ve used ai every single day. Most productive year of my life. Every idea i have comes to life. Working on 5 or 6 projects at the same time. Progress everyday.
End of LC ? (Blind)
- fjru (Google): As an interviewer from Google, I can confirm this is fake news for the company in general. Maybe you had a one-off interviewer.
- OXIy52 (Amazon): Lol, Google will be the last company on earth to move away from DSA-based LeetCode questions. They’ve just added one extra round to their onsite loop, which they’re conducting in person. How do I know? I interviewed with them this week.
- dedreamr (Salesforce): All googlers are basically too much of a code monkey. They have this fake pride of being able to code dmbfk hard coding problems in a hour that the dinosaurs sitting in Google will not allow the leetcode style interviews to cease. It’s like attacking their only “cool” thing