Generated by Codex with GPT-5

This summary covers The Economist’s April 25th, 2026 International article listed in the contents as Military innovation in Ukraine and published under the headline Battlefield formation.

The article argues that Ukraine’s war effort has become a live laboratory for military technology. Drones, unmanned ground vehicles and AI-assisted systems are no longer peripheral experiments. They are increasingly central to how Ukraine supplies troops, strikes Russian forces, protects soldiers from exposure and compensates for being outmatched in manpower and traditional firepower.

Generated by Codex with GPT-5

This summary covers The Economist’s April 25th, 2026 Finance & economics Buttonwood column listed in the contents as Too-stablecoins and published under the subtitle Why the stablecoin market is fizzling.

The article argues that stablecoins have not yet become the financial revolution their boosters promised. They are meant to be the sober part of crypto: digital tokens pegged to the dollar and backed by safe assets such as Treasury bills. That design should, in theory, make them useful for payments, attractive as a store of value in unstable economies and helpful to America by increasing demand for government debt.

Generated by Codex with GPT-5

This summary covers The Economist’s April 25th, 2026 China column listed in the contents as Chaguan: Tech transfer and published under the headline The world wants Chinese tech.

The article argues that the politics of technology transfer have flipped. For decades, Western governments and companies worried that China was forcing, coaxing or stealing foreign know-how. Now many of them face the opposite problem: China has become strong enough in electric vehicles, batteries, robotics and other advanced industries that outsiders want Chinese knowledge, factories and production methods to move abroad.

Generated by Codex with GPT-5

This summary covers The Economist’s April 25th, 2026 China article listed in the contents as Chinese satellites over the Middle East and published under the headline Offering alternatives.

The article argues that China’s rapidly improving commercial satellite industry is changing the politics of wartime intelligence. During the conflict involving Iran, Israel and America, Chinese satellite firms have released images of military sites, damaged infrastructure and deployed weapons at a moment when American providers have become more constrained. That has given China a way to help America’s adversaries indirectly while advertising a fast-maturing space industry.

Generated by Codex with GPT-5

This summary covers The Economist’s April 25th, 2026 Science & technology article listed in the contents as Chernobyl, 40 years on and published under the headline A laboratory like no other.

The article argues that Chernobyl is no longer only a synonym for nuclear catastrophe. Forty years after reactor number four exploded, the site has become an unmatched field laboratory for understanding how radiation moves through water, soil, food, microbes, animals and human institutions. The disaster was real, deadly and politically consequential. Yet its long afterlife has produced a large body of practical knowledge about what nuclear accidents do, what they do not do, and how societies should respond when fear outruns evidence.

Generated by Codex with GPT-5

This summary covers The Economist’s April 25th, 2026 International article listed in the contents as European defence tech and published under the headline Slow and unsteady.

The article argues that Europe has begun to understand the military importance of cheap, software-driven unmanned systems, but has not yet built the industrial machinery needed to produce them at wartime scale. Drones, autonomous submarines, unmanned ground vehicles and battlefield software are no longer speculative extras. They are becoming central to how modern armies detect, strike, supply and survive.

Generated by Codex with GPT-5

This summary covers The Economist’s April 25th, 2026 Science & technology article listed in the contents as Crypto-jacking and published under the headline Whose mine is it anyway?.

The article argues that crypto-jacking has become a durable form of cybercrime because it turns other people’s computing infrastructure into a hidden energy subsidy. Mining cryptocurrencies can be expensive because it consumes large amounts of processing power and electricity. Criminals can cut that cost most brutally by forcing victims to provide both.

Generated by Codex with GPT-5

This summary covers The Economist’s April 25th, 2026 United States article listed in the contents as Legislating with AI and published under the headline Vote for Claude.

The article argues that artificial intelligence is quietly becoming part of the machinery of American state government. The change is not arriving first as grand constitutional theory or futuristic campaign rhetoric. It is arriving through overworked legislators, small staffs and mundane bottlenecks: research, bill drafting, talking points, hearing preparation and quick checks against lobbyists’ claims.

Generated by Codex with GPT-5

This summary covers The Economist’s April 25th, 2026 Business article listed in the contents as Bezos v Musk and published under the headline Star wars.

The article argues that Jeff Bezos’s space ambitions are no longer just a side project attached to his fortune. Blue Origin and Amazon are becoming parts of the same strategic contest with Elon Musk’s SpaceX: reusable rockets, satellite internet, lunar transport and the infrastructure of the commercial space economy. The problem is that SpaceX already has the thing every rival wants, a tightly integrated machine that builds satellites, launches them and sells the resulting service at scale.

Generated by Codex with GPT-5

This summary covers The Economist’s April 25th, 2026 International article listed in the contents as America's arms industry and published under the headline Shooting to prominence.

The article argues that America’s defence industry is entering a disruptive phase. The Pentagon still relies on giant contractors such as Lockheed Martin, RTX and Northrop Grumman, but war is changing faster than their procurement habits. Cheap drones, software-defined weapons and battlefield AI are making older, costlier systems look ill-suited to some of the conflicts the United States is now fighting or preparing for.