Generated by Codex with GPT 5.6 Sol High

China is trying to make its banks finance the next phase of growth while they are still absorbing the last phase’s losses. In “Drip feed”, The Economist argues that a fresh capital injection will help the country’s largest lenders recognise some bad debts and keep extending credit, but is too small to resolve the financial system’s deeper problems.

A vast system carrying old damage

China’s Ministry of Finance has put \$54bn into eight state-owned banks and insurers, with most of the money going to two giant lenders. That sounds large until set against a banking system with \$74trn in assets. The state depends heavily on these banks because capital markets provide only a limited share of the money needed for economic growth and Xi Jinping’s industrial ambitions.

The banks are already burdened by years of cleanup. Regulators have curbed shadow banking, fragile online-lending platforms and excessive property borrowing. Local-government financing vehicles have also been pushed to confront some of their debts. These measures helped China avoid a full financial crisis, but households paid through losses on bank-sold wealth products and a property slump that destroyed enormous amounts of wealth.

The repair is incomplete. The article says only about 60% of 2.3trn yuan in real-estate debt has been resolved, while local-government financing firms may owe around 70trn yuan. Banks often roll over questionable loans instead of recording them as bad debts, especially when the borrowers are local-government vehicles or weak state-owned companies. That postpones losses but ties up capital that could otherwise support new lending.

Relief without a reckoning

Smaller lenders add another layer of risk. Large banks have been enlisted to absorb troubled county and village institutions, and consolidation may reduce China’s bank count from more than 4,000 in 2019 to about 2,300 by the end of 2026. Meanwhile, the sector’s net interest margin has fallen from 2.1 percentage points in 2022 to 1.4 points since 2025, weakening its ability to earn its way out of trouble.

The new money is therefore less a rescue than additional room to manoeuvre. It lets banks write off some old loans while continuing to lend to favoured industries such as advanced manufacturing. Yet the injection cannot both cleanse balance-sheets and fund the scale of technology investment Beijing wants.

The article’s central criticism is that gradual capital top-ups preserve stability without forcing a full accounting of toxic assets. A sharper reckoning could free more lending capacity in the long run, but would also expose losses and create political disruption. Because Xi prefers control to upheaval, China is likely to keep administering small doses of relief. That may prevent a sudden collapse, while leaving its banks too constrained to power the growth strategy expected of them.

Source: The Economist, September 12th 2026, “Drip feed”, Finance & economics, pp. 67-69; listed in the contents as “China’s timid bank reforms”.